Mech-Vision 2.1 Release Notes

You are currently viewing the documentation for version 2.1.0. To access documentation for other versions, click the "Switch Version" button located in the upper-right corner of the page.

■ To use the latest version, visit the Mech-Mind Download Center to download it.

■ If you're unsure about the version of the product you are using, please contact Mech-Mind Technical Support for assistance.

This document introduces the new features, improvements, and resolved issues of Mech-Vision 2.1.

Mech-Vision 2.1.0 Release Notes

This document introduces the improvements and resolved issues of Mech-Vision 2.1.0.

Improvements

Improved the “Check Pose Repeatability by Statistics” Step

A “Display Range as Positive and Negative Values” parameter has been added to the Check Pose Repeatability by Statistics Step in Mech-Vision 2.1.0. Once selected, the range in the statistics file will be expressed using both positive and negative values.

Improved “System Memory Risk Alert” Feature

Starting from Mech-Vision 2.1.0, virtual memory is no longer a criterion for monitoring the system memory. A prompt to restart the software will only appear if it has been running continuously for an extended period or if physical memory is insufficient.

Resolved Issues

  • When an entire point cloud model is used for 3D coarse matching, if the target object was too thin, the downsampling interval could exceed the object’s thickness. This resulted in retaining the point cloud of a single view during matching, causing incorrect matching results.

  • When the “3D Matching” Step was used as an input within a Procedure and connected to a data flow, the software crashed if the “Input Type” of the “3D Matching” Step was adjusted.

  • If the “Auto-Set Voting Parameters” option was disabled in the “3D Matching” Step and voting parameters were manually adjusted, executing the single Step would apply the manual settings. However, even after re-enabling “Auto-Set Voting Parameters” and executing the single Step, the manually adjusted parameters were still used for matching.

  • For the “3D Fine Matching” Step, when the Operation Approach was set to “HighPrecision" and “Speed Up on Large Object Quantities” was unselected, the matching results for symmetric target objects were incorrect.

  • When a copy of the point cloud model generated by importing an STL file was created in the target object editor, the STL model dimensions became incorrect after returning to the “Configure STL file” step.

  • After modifying the axis of symmetry for the pick point array in the target object editor, the “Order of symmetry” and “Angle range” displayed in the parameter panel were incorrect.

  • When a copy of the target object model was created and used in the target object editor, the point cloud of the target object was not removed during project execution, even when the “Remove Target Object Cloud” parameter in the “Output” or “Path Planning” Step was selected.

  • In the EIH scenario, clicking the Get data button in the pose adjustment tool incorrectly updated the robot flange pose.


Is this page helpful?

You can give a feedback in any of the following ways:

We Value Your Privacy

We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use the site, you acknowledge that you agree to the use of cookies. If you decline, a single cookie will be used to ensure you're not tracked or remembered when you visit this website.